Over the past couple of weeks we have looked at studies suggesting that religion rots your
intelligence and that religion rots teens’ intelligence, and, not surprisingly,
both theses fell apart. Now here is a different, more solid proposition.

In “Religious factors and hippocampal atrophy in late
life,” Amy Owen and colleagues at Duke University found that in
late life there was greater atrophy in the hippocampus (associated with memory)
among individuals who have been “born again,” as well as those
with no religious affiliation. Hippocampal volume change has been linked to
depression, dementia, and Alzheimer syndrome. Of course, we’ve already been told
that “many scientists view “outspoken religious commitment as a sign
of mild dementia.”,
a charge aimed at genome mapper Francis Collins, who makes no secret that he is
a Christian, but this is a serious look at the subject.

Unlike the earlier studies we’ve look at, Owen et al’s
evaluation of the MRIs of 268 men and women aged 58 and over appears sound:

“These longitudinal associations were not
explained by baseline psychosocial or psychiatric factors (social support,
stress, and depression status), demographic factors, duration in the study, or
total baseline cerebral volume. Frequency of public and private religious
activity did not predict changes in hippocampal volume.”

The participants were originally recruited for the
NeuroCognitive Outcomes of Depression in the Elderly study, and chosen because
they answered some additional questions regarding their religious beliefs and
affiliation. So the obvious bases were covered.

In “Religious Experiences Shrink Part of the Brain: A
study links life-changing religious experiences, like being born again, with
atrophy in the hippocampus” (Scientific
American, May
31, 2011) neuroscientist Andrew Newberg, M.D. observes, “ It is a
surprising result, given that many prior studies have shown religion to have
potentially beneficial effects on brain function, anxiety, and depression.” He
adds that the study is “unique” in that

“it focuses specifically on religious
individuals compared to non-religious individuals. This study also broke down
these individuals into those who are born again or who have had life-changing
religious experiences.”

He might have added that “no religion” had the same
effect on the hippocampus. The real winners in this study were people who were
conventionally religious but had never had a spiritual or “born again”
experience.

It’s well established that religious belief and
practice are usually associated with better health. Mario Beauregard and I
devoted an entire chapter of The Spiritual Brain to studies in this area
(Chapter 8), and a number of books have unpacked them as well. There is also
good evidence that “negative”religious beliefs are bad for one’s health. As we
noted in TSB,

“One study found that ill elderly patients
were more likely to die if they had a conflicted relationship with their
religious beliefs. The researchers studied 595 patients of fifty-five or over
at Duke University Medical Center and Durham VA Medical Center. They achieved a
complete follow-up on 444 patients, including 176 who had died. Those patients
who strongly agreed with statements like “wondered whether God had abandoned
me; felt punished by God for my lack of devotion; wondered what I did for God
to punish me; questioned God’s love for me; wondered whether my church had
abandoned me; decided the Devil made this happen; and questioned the power of
God” were significantly more likely to die (19–28 percent greater mortality
during the two-year period after discharge from hospital). The authors
concluded: “Certain forms of religiousness may increase the risk of death.
Elderly ill men and women who experience a religious struggle with their
illness appear to be at increased risk of death, even after controlling for
baseline health, mental health status, and demographic factors.” (TSB, p. 237)”

So beliefs matter, whether positive or negative. But
why should strong beliefs, pro or anti-religion, be worse for the hippocampus
than lukewarm belief?

The authors suggest that one factor might be stress,
noting that both extremes are minority positions. That makes intuitive sense
because minority status entails more conflict over beliefs, independent of
content. Newberg adds, among other thoughtful suggestions, that some

… experience religious struggle because
of conflicting ideas with their religious tradition or their family. Even very
positive, life-changing experiences might be difficult to incorporate into the
individual’s prevailing religious belief system and this can also lead to
stress and anxiety.

That, of course, accords with religious history: The
people who have encountered God are usually remembered not for a less stressful
life but a more meaningful one.

(Note: Here’s a story, now available
online, about a very old man who had a spiritual experience after a major
assault on his brain.)

Next: No
more religion means no more superstition. Right?
Previous:Does religion rot your intelligence? and Does religion rot teenagers’ brains?

Denyse O’Leary is co-author of The Spiritual Brain.

Avatar

Denyse O’Leary is an author, journalist, and blogger who has mainly written popular science and social science. Fellow Canadian Marshall McLuhan’s description of electronic media as a global village...