The UK government has approved a new test for pregnant women that will make it much easier to detect and search out any babies with Down’s Syndrome (DS).
According to the BBC, the non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT) will be rolled out by the NHS from 2018.
NIPT involves taking a sample of blood from the pregnant woman which is then examined for abnormal fetal DNA. It is called “non-invasive” because it doesn’t involve “invading” the mother’s womb. It therefore carries no risk of miscarrying a “normal” pregnancy.
It is claimed that NIPT will cut the number of women who need invasive tests like amniocentesis and chorion villus biopsy, which carry a 1-2 percent risk of miscarriage.
The move to make NIPT available on the NHS is extremely controversial and has led to the launch of the “Don’t screen us out” campaign (DSUO). DSUO describes itself “as a grass-roots initiative supported by a collection of people with Down’s syndrome, families and Down’s Syndrome advocate groups led by Saving Downs Syndrome“.
They say that, given the fact that 90 percent of babies who are prenatally diagnosed with Down’s syndrome are currently aborted, the result will be “a profound increase in the number of children with Down’s syndrome screened out by termination”.
A new study published in the British Medical Journal on 4 July 2016 backs up their concerns.
The lead author, Professor Lyn Chitty, and her colleagues calculate that in an annual screening population of 698,500, offering NIPT (as a contingent test to women with a Down’s syndrome screening risk of at least 1/150) would increase detection by 195 cases with 3,368 fewer invasive tests but, crucially, only 17 fewer procedure related miscarriages.
If rolling out NIPT will result in 195 more babies with Down’s syndrome being detected, then assuming that 90 percent will then be aborted (the standard quoted figure), that means almost 180 more abortions for Down’s syndrome each year.
At the weekend, 279 medical professionals signed a letter accusing the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) of “advocating that women with a prenatal diagnosis of Down’s syndrome should end their pregnancy”. They said: “We utterly reject the implicit premise that the value of a human being is based on their economic contribution to society.” (see full text here)
The move to introduce NIPT into the National Health Service (NHS) is also backed by powerful commercial interests.
One of the National Screening Committee stakeholders (reviewing and recommending implementation of these tests) is Antenatal Results and Choices (ARC). ARC is probably the best known charity offering advice on screening, where many women go for “non-directive information and support”.
However ARC has just announced a corporate partnership with a US company called Natera, one of the leading suppliers of the UK screening test (marketed as “Panorama”). This is an addition to their “partnership” with at least seven other providers of screening tests!
In other words, regularly advising the Government’s National Screening Committee, and thus government policy, is an organisation that is financially partnered with, and inextricably linked to, all the main providers of the very tests they are pushing to implement! (more here)
The test manufacturers must be delighted to have such good access to the “review” process.
In March 2015 the St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust revealed that it was joining forces with the British firm Premaitha Health to bring in this new screening test. Premaitha, which describes the test (marketed as “Iona”) as its “flagship product”, along with its shareholders, now stands to make a lot of money. Millions of pounds in fact. Each NIPT test costs between £400 and £900 pounds. Do the maths!
Premaitha admitted this much in a press release earlier this year: “Premaitha anticipates that the endorsement by the NHS will accelerate private payer market growth in the UK”. More importantly, it will put them in pole position to pitch for NHS hospital tenders.
On October 27 at its AGM the company was even bolder. Non-executive Chairman Adam Reynolds, claimed that “the international landscape for non-invasive prenatal testing is evolving very considerably in Premaitha’s favour”. He added that the company was “exceptionally well placed to win significant market share as awareness of the availability of NIPT increases”.
Premaitha has “absolutely no doubt that the developed world is moving” towards “widescale adoption of NIPT” and that it “is well placed to gain a large share of the market”.
So here we have it – a global drama involving pregnant women anxious about having disabled children, campaigners concerned about the eradication of people with disabilities, millions of pounds of taxpayers’ money, biotechnology companies hungry for profits and salivating shareholders seeking a quick buck.
Caught in this toxic web of vested interests, the real victims in this whole drama are babies with a common genetic abnormality whose eradication will lift a perceived burden from some and make others very rich indeed.
The real test of an administration is in what it values – and in particular how it treats the most vulnerable members of society, especially when it costs something emotionally and financially to do so.
The British government, by this reckoning, is not heading in a good direction. But disabled people and their families will not go quietly and I suspect we have not heard the last of this.
Dr Peter Saunders is Chief Executive the Christian Medical Fellowship in the UK and was formerly a general surgeon. He also serves on the boards of the International Christian Medical and Dental Association and Coalition for Marriage and is campaign director for the Care Not Killing Alliance. This article has been republished with permission from the CMF blog.